<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Zhaoyun</id>
	<title>PC5271 wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Zhaoyun"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php/Special:Contributions/Zhaoyun"/>
	<updated>2026-04-15T20:53:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2486</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2486"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T12:52:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the measurement we can get the following data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time&amp;amp;nbsp;(s) !! Cylinder pressure&amp;amp;nbsp;(psi)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 840.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 837.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 835.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 834.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 834.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 833.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 833.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 833.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 832.9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 832.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 832.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 832.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 832.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 832.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 832.2&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:150%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus we can get the following tables present the output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations(the volumn of the chamber is 80ml). Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:150%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the pressure,V is the volume, n is the number of moles,R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. In our case, T = 295K, V= 130ml (which is the volumn of the gas cylinder).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Volumn of cylinder.jpg |Volumn of cylinder&lt;br /&gt;
File:Temperature.png|Temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accorading to these above, we can calculate the exact concentartion of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(the air chamber&#039;s volumn is approximately 80ml), we use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration to plot the curve:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2484</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2484"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T12:51:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the measurement we can get the following data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time&amp;amp;nbsp;(s) !! Cylinder pressure&amp;amp;nbsp;(psi)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 840.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 837.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 835.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 834.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 834.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 833.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 833.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 833.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 832.9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 832.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 832.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 832.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 832.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 832.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 832.2&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\large\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus we can get the following tables present the output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations(the volumn of the chamber is 80ml). Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:150%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the pressure,V is the volume, n is the number of moles,R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. In our case, T = 295K, V= 130ml (which is the volumn of the gas cylinder).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Volumn of cylinder.jpg |Volumn of cylinder&lt;br /&gt;
File:Temperature.png|Temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accorading to these above, we can calculate the exact concentartion of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(the air chamber&#039;s volumn is approximately 80ml), we use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration to plot the curve:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2482</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2482"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T12:49:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the measurement we can get the following data:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time&amp;amp;nbsp;(s) !! Cylinder pressure&amp;amp;nbsp;(psi)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 840.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 837.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 835.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 834.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 834.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 833.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 833.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 833.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 832.9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 832.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 832.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 832.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 832.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 832.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 832.2&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:150%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the pressure,V is the volume, n is the number of moles,R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. In our case, T = 295K, V= 130ml (which is the volumn of the gas cylinder).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Volumn of cylinder.jpg |Volumn of cylinder&lt;br /&gt;
File:Temperature.png|Temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accorading to these above, we can calculate the exact concentartion of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(the air chamber&#039;s volumn is approximately 80ml), we use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration to plot the curve:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2456</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2456"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T12:08:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:150%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the pressure,V is the volume, n is the number of moles,R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. In our case, T = 295K, V= 130ml (which is the volumn of the gas cylinder).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Volumn of cylinder.jpg |Volumn of cylinder&lt;br /&gt;
File:Temperature.png|Temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accorading to these above, we can calculate the exact concentartion of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(the air chamber&#039;s volumn is approximately 80ml), we use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration to plot the curve:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2454</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2454"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T12:07:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:150%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the pressure,V is the volume, n is the number of moles,R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. In our case, T = 295K, V= 130ml (which is the volumn of the gas cylinder).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Volumn.jpg|Volumn of cylinder&lt;br /&gt;
File:Temperature.png|Temperature&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accorading to these above, we can calculate the exact concentartion of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;(the air chamber&#039;s volumn is approximately 80ml), we use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration to plot the curve:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:Temperature.png&amp;diff=2451</id>
		<title>File:Temperature.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:Temperature.png&amp;diff=2451"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T12:04:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:Volumn_of_cylinder.jpg&amp;diff=2450</id>
		<title>File:Volumn of cylinder.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:Volumn_of_cylinder.jpg&amp;diff=2450"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T12:03:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2445</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2445"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T12:01:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:150%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the pressure,V is the volume, n is the number of moles,R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. In our case, T = 295K, V= 130ml (which is the volumn of the gas cylinder).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2443</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2443"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:57:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;font-size:150%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the pressure,V is the volume, n is the number of moles,R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2441</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2441"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:57:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\large\mathbf{PV = nRT}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the pressure,V is the volume, n is the number of moles,R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2438</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2438"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:55:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ideal gas law, the corresponding number of moles can be calculated:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;PV = nRT&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where  &lt;br /&gt;
\( P \) = pressure (in pascals, Pa),  &lt;br /&gt;
\( V \) = volume (in cubic meters, m³),  &lt;br /&gt;
\( n \) = number of moles (mol),  &lt;br /&gt;
\( R \) = ideal gas constant (8.314 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹),  &lt;br /&gt;
\( T \) = absolute temperature (in kelvins, K).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2432</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2432"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:53:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;500px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;350px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2431</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2431"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:53:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery widths=&amp;quot;300px&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;200px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2429</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2429"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:52:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:pressure.jpg|Measurement of Pressure&lt;br /&gt;
File:voltage.jpg|Measurement of Voltage&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pressure.jpg|none|thumb|400px|Measurement of Pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:voltage.jpg|none|thumb|400px|Measurement of Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2428</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2428"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:51:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pressure.jpg|none|thumb|400px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Measurement of Pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:voltage.jpg|none|thumb|400px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Measurement of Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2427</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2427"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:50:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pressure.jpg|center|thumb|400px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Measurement of Pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:voltage.jpg|center|thumb|400px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Measurement of Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2426</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2426"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:49:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
At a room temperature of 21.9°C and with a gas chamber volume of approximately 80 mL, three sets of voltage measurements were taken using a multimeter under identical pressure conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pressure.jpg|center|thumb|400px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Measurement of Pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:voltage|center|thumb|400px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Measurement of Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2422</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2422"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:48:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
We measured three sets of voltage values under the same pressure conditions, with the gas chamber at room temperature (21.9°C) and a volume of approximately 80 mL.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:pressure.jpg|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Measurement of Pressure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:voltage|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Measurement of Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:Pressure.jpg&amp;diff=2420</id>
		<title>File:Pressure.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:Pressure.jpg&amp;diff=2420"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:47:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:Voltage.jpg&amp;diff=2419</id>
		<title>File:Voltage.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:Voltage.jpg&amp;diff=2419"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:47:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2417</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2417"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:47:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
We measured three sets of voltage values under the same pressure conditions, with the gas chamber at room temperature (21.9°C) and a volume of approximately 80 mL.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|600px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2415</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2415"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:46:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
We measured three sets of voltage values under the same pressure conditions, with the gas chamber at room temperature (21.9°C) and a volume of approximately 80 mL.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|750px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the results presented in the figure, it can be observed that the curve exhibits an approximately linear trend, indicating that the detector output responds steadily to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration. Thus, under identical environmental conditions, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred directly from the measured output voltage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2404</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2404"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:39:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|750px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2403</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2403"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:39:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Procedure */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|750px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2402</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2402"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:38:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Procedure */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:System.png|center|thumb|500px|System Overview Diagram ]]&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|750px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:System.png&amp;diff=2401</id>
		<title>File:System.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:System.png&amp;diff=2401"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:37:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2396</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2396"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:28:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|750px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2394</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2394"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:27:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|750px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2391</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2391"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:27:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|750px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2390</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2390"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:27:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Procedure */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2389</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2389"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:25:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Introduction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|500px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2388</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2388"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:25:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Team Members */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2387</id>
		<title>CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2387"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:25:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: Created page with &amp;quot;== Team Members ==  Zhao Yun A0295128X  Xie Zihan A0295111M  Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2386</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2386"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:22:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2385</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2385"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:22:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|left|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2384</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2384"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:21:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|left|thumb|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2383</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2383"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:20:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Procedure */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|center|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2382</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2382"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:20:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2380</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2380"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:19:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Conclusion */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|thumb|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conclusion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we successfully developed a CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; sensing system based on infrared absorption at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. By monitoring the voltage output of a photodetector and analyzing its response to varying CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations, we demonstrated a clear and repeatable inverse correlation between gas concentration and detector output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although minor deviations were observed—primarily due to environmental noise, limited gas sealing, and optical interference—the overall results confirmed the system&#039;s sensitivity to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; levels. The fitted exponential model further validated the expected behavior derived from the Beer–Lambert law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite inherent measurement uncertainties, the system reliably responded to changes in CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration, indicating the successful realization of a functional gas sensor prototype.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2379</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2379"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:19:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|thumb|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2378</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2378"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:18:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|center|thumb|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2377</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2377"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:17:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Results and Analysis */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Results and Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following tables present the measured output voltages from the photodetector corresponding to different CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations. Each voltage value represents an individual measurement, and an average is calculated from three groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Time (s) !! CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; (%) !! Group 1 (mV) !! Group 2 (mV) !! Group 3 (mV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 0  || 0.042  || 241.9 || 238.0 || 237.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1  || 32 || 233.1 || 215.9 || 223.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2  || 48 || 176.0 || 166.6 || 173.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3  || 58 || 165.6 || 160.8 || 156.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4  || 65 || 149.7 || 155.4 || 156.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5  || 70 || 139.0 || 143.0 || 139.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6  || 73 || 129.0 || 132.2 || 129.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7  || 76 || 132.7 || 129.4 || 133.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8  || 79 || 121.2 || 115.7 || 125.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9  || 81 || 120.5 || 115.5 || 121.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || 82 || 116.0 || 114.2 || 114.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 11 || 83 || 110.7 || 113.1 || 113.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 12 || 84 || 107.7 || 107.6 || 108.2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 13 || 85 || 104.7 || 102.3 || 102.4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 14 || 86 || 99.0  || 101.4 || 100.8&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Table: Raw voltage measurements across three groups&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the averaged voltage response as a function of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
V(c) = 280.45 \cdot e^{-0.01057 \cdot c}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where:&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039;: output voltage (in mV)&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;c&#039;&#039;: CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration (in %)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:co2_voltage_plot.png|center|thumb|300px|CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration vs. Photodetector Output Voltage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Analysis ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nonlinear Voltage Response to CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Concentration ===&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between output voltage and CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration is not strictly linear. In the low concentration range (e.g., from 0.042% to around 30%), the voltage drops slowly, whereas at higher concentrations the decline becomes significantly steeper. This behavior can be attributed to the logarithmic nature of infrared absorption and the nonlinear response of the photodetector—where sensitivity increases as light intensity decreases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Imperfections and External Influences ===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to limitations in the experimental setup, complete gas sealing could not be achieved, potentially causing gas leakage or imperfect mixing. In addition, uncontrolled external infrared sources may have introduced optical noise into the system, affecting the sensor output. This optical interference is one of the main contributors to measurement uncertainty and reduces the system’s repeatability and precision.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2376</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2376"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:16:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Procedure */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg&amp;diff=2375</id>
		<title>File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:07e559e7cb1ccaf8d405442afb2907c.jpg&amp;diff=2375"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:14:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2374</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2374"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:14:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1745923203643.png|thumb|250px|System Setup]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:1745923203643.png&amp;diff=2371</id>
		<title>File:1745923203643.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=File:1745923203643.png&amp;diff=2371"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:12:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2366</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2366"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:08:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Procedure */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Procedure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experiment aimed to quantify the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration by monitoring the voltage output from a photodetector, which corresponds to the transmitted infrared light intensity at the characteristic wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm. A broadband infrared light source was used, and a narrow-band filter isolated the desired wavelength. The gas chamber used for the measurements had a fixed volume of 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL. The procedure was as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;System Setup&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* A broadband infrared light source was used to emit light through the gas chamber (volume: 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL).&lt;br /&gt;
* A narrow-band optical filter centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm was placed before the photodetector to ensure only light at this wavelength reached the sensor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A photodetector (light intensity sensor) was connected to a data acquisition system, which recorded the output voltage corresponding to the detected light intensity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Initial Measurement&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* With ambient air (approximately 400&amp;amp;nbsp;ppm CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) in the gas chamber, the initial sensor output voltage &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; was measured and recorded as the baseline.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; Injection and Voltage Recording&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlled increments of CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; gas were introduced into the 80&amp;amp;nbsp;mL gas chamber, gradually increasing the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration.&lt;br /&gt;
* After each increment, the output voltage &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; from the photodetector was measured and recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* The process was repeated for multiple concentration levels to establish the relationship between CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration and sensor voltage output.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &#039;&#039;&#039;Data Recording and Analysis&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* The voltage outputs &#039;&#039;V&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;0&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&#039;&#039; (initial) and &#039;&#039;V&#039;&#039; (at each CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; level) were systematically recorded.&lt;br /&gt;
* A calibration curve was plotted with CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration on the x-axis and photodetector output voltage on the y-axis, representing the detection characteristic.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2365</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2365"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:06:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Team Members */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2364</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2364"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:06:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Team Members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zhao Yun A0295128X&lt;br /&gt;
Xie Zihan A0295111M&lt;br /&gt;
Zhang Wenbo A0307226L&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2361</id>
		<title>Talk:CO2 Concentration Detector</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://pc5271.org/PC5271_AY2425S2/index.php?title=Talk:CO2_Concentration_Detector&amp;diff=2361"/>
		<updated>2025-04-29T11:04:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Zhaoyun: /* Introduction */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carbon dioxide (CO\textsubscript{2}) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO\textsubscript{2} concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO\textsubscript{2} exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26~$\mu$m, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO\textsubscript{2}. According to the Beer-Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26~$\mu$m, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO\textsubscript{2} concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Carbon dioxide&#039;&#039;&#039; (CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) is a critical greenhouse gas whose concentration monitoring is essential for various applications, including environmental protection, industrial process control, and indoor air quality management. One effective method for detecting CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentrations relies on the molecule&#039;s specific absorption characteristics in the infrared region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; exhibits a strong absorption peak at a wavelength of 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, which corresponds to its fundamental vibrational mode. By exploiting this property, we can design an optical detection system that measures the intensity attenuation of infrared light at this wavelength as it passes through a gas chamber containing CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. According to the Beer–Lambert law, the degree of light absorption is directly related to the concentration of the absorbing gas, enabling quantitative analysis:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A = \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_0}{I} \right) = \varepsilon \, c \, L&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this project, we aim to develop such a detection apparatus. The system comprises an infrared light source centered at 4.26&amp;amp;nbsp;μm, a gas chamber, and an infrared detector. By monitoring the reduction in light intensity after it traverses the gas chamber, the CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; concentration can be inferred. This method offers non-invasive, real-time measurement capabilities and has the potential for high sensitivity and specificity.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Zhaoyun</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>